All posts in Collections

Take Better Aim With Your Collections Messages

What in the world could flies in the urinals at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport have to do with improving the performance of your collections operation?

That's what a roomful of Varolii clients wondered when Dr. Mathew Isaac showed this picture during his presentation "The Message Effect: How Content and Channel Choice Influence Consumer Behavior" at our annual customer conference.

urinal speck Take Better Aim With Your Collections Messages

According to Dr. Isaac, a professor at Seattle University's Albers School of Business & Economics, the Dutch airport authorities have found that providing a target such as a fly (actually the image of a fly etched into the urinal porcelain) has reduced "spillage" in the men's restrooms by 80%. As he went on to explain, this gentle "nudge" is an example of how experiments in human psychology provide insights that can be applied to domains other than airport maintenance.

If you are designing messages to influence customer behavior, Dr. Isaac says there are three levers for motivating behavioral change: Words, Options and Channel.

Words, words, words

When it comes to words, how you say something is often as important as what you say. Consider "valence framing", which contrasts the impact of positively and negatively phrased statements. Research shows that sometimes its better to focus on the downside of not doing something rather than the upside of doing something. For example:

"If you don't quit smoking, you increase the risk of developing lung cancer" has proven a better smoking deterrent than "If you quit smoking, you reduce your risk of developing lung cancer"

Applying the same principal to a collections message suggests saying:

"If you don't make your payment today, you will incur a late charge" will cure more accounts than "If you make your payment today, you will avoid a late charge."

If one choice is good, three must be better?

The options we give to customers is another dimension of message design to consider. Specifically, limiting the number of options presented in a message can drive a higher response rate. Dr. Isaac cited a grocery store experiment where some shoppers were offered samples of six different flavors of organic fruit jams and other shoppers could choose from 24 different flavors. While both sample booths were equally busy with tasters, the booth that offered only six flavors resulted in 500% more product sales!

So even though you might offer your customers four different methods of payment (e.g. ACH, Credit Card, PIN-less Debit and Cash) through five different contact channels (e.g. Web, Smartphone Application, IVR, Kiosk and good old postal mail), its probably not a good idea to offer all of these in a collections message when a simple "to make your payment now, press 1" will do.

Switching channels

Picking the right channel for message delivery can not only affect your customer reach, but the channel by its very nature may be more conducive to collecting a payment from a past due account. Consider a phone call to a customer's workplace compared to a text message to their mobile phone. The customer may be very reluctant to converse with you in an open and honest fashion at their job about why they haven't paid their bill, let alone read off their bank account or credit card numbers to make a payment. But the same information delivered via a text message will let them take care of the problem in private, and it will often cost you less than the phone call.

The importance of testing

Dr. Isaac shared several other examples of how changes in content, options and channel have been shown to improve outcomes in healthcare, commerce and collections, but he made a point of closing his presentation with a call for experimentation. Only you can determine what works best for your company in the context of your products, services and the type of customer you serve and the best way to figure it out is to run randomly controlled tests that compare customer reaction to different strategies. Varolii can assist you in this effort, with everything from simple A vs. B testing to multi-variable experiments from which we derive predictive segmentation models.

We don't, however, offer stencils for your urinals. But you can order them online.

Debtors get new hope, collectors a new tool

VantageScore, the three major credit bureus' scoring competitor to Fico, has announced they will no longer be including paid off bad debts in calculating consumer's credit score.

VantageScore says cold, hard numbers motivated it to make the change. The company was trying to build a model that offered the best possible predictions of consumer behavior, and its mathematicians determined paid collections accounts are a poor predictor of default.

"At the end of the day, the mathematics had to win out from an objective standpoint, and not from a subjective standpoint," says VantageScore President and Chief Executive Officer Barrett Burns, though he is well aware of the controversy over counting unpaid collection accounts.

While there will be a raging debate about the validity and propriety of the move, from a consumer's perspective, it represents hope that a temporary financial setback won't necessarily raise their cost of credit for the foreseeable future.

Collectors should also benefit, as they could truthfully inform debtors that paying off their bad debts would in certain circumstances, improve their credit scores.

It will be interesting to see if Fico follows suit, and if the move blunts efforts in Congress to make it illegal to consider paid off medical debts in credit scoring.

The Nine Most Terrifying Words

CFPB's defines their recently released mortgage servicing rules

According to Ronald Reagan, the nine most terrifying words in the English language are “I’m from the government and I’m here to help” but my recent experience with the CFPB calls that into question.

During the recent MBA National Mortgage Servicing conference in Dallas, David Silberman, the CFPB's Associate Director of Research, Markets and Regulation, gave a brisk 90 minute review of the bureau's recently released rules for mortgage servicing.

How can I call a 90 minute review brisk? Considering the rules and accompanying analysis check in at over 800 pages, anything less would have provided only a glimpse at what lies within. Instead, Mr. Silberman did an admirable job of running the attendees through the soup to nuts of the meal we will all be consuming for the foreseeable future.

He also acknowledged there will inevitably be questions about the meaning and intent of many of the rules. That's why I was pleased, if somewhat skeptical, when he promoted the Office of Regulation's hotline (202-435-7700) as where you can "ask questions on how to interpret or apply the Bureau’s specific regulations."

Really? OK, then let's give that hotline a test drive.

Since among other things, Varolii helps our servicer clients communicate with borrowers who are behind on their mortgage payments, I was interested in better understanding Section 1024.39 of their Mortgage Servicing Rules under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) which addresses “Early Intervention Requirements for Certain Borrowers”.

One of these requirements states that:

“A servicer shall establish or make good faith efforts to establish live contact with a delinquent borrower not later than the 36th day of the borrower’s delinquency and, promptly after establishing live contact, inform such borrower about the availability of loss mitigation options if appropriate.”

That is all well and good – we’d expect most servicers to establish contact with their borrowers before they were 36 days past due, even without this rule, to reduce delinquency. But what is meant by "good faith efforts"?

To answer that question, the paragraph continues with the following:

“Good faith efforts to establish live contact consist of reasonable steps under the circumstances to reach a borrower and may include telephoning the borrower on more than one occasion or sending written or electronic communication encouraging the borrower to establish live contact with the servicer."

Now we're getting somewhere, but "electronic communication" isn't defined here or anywhere else in the document.

Time to call the hotline. Here's a rundown of my experience, including a couple of lessons learned should you wish to do the same.

Lesson 1: Don't bother calling. The hotline is answered by a recording that directs you to email your inquiry to cfpb_reginquiries@cfpb.gov. So you might as well start there, which I went ahead and did asking:

Would the term "electronic communication" include the following:

  1. Text messages sent to a mobile phone number provided by the borrower
  2. Emails sent to an email address provided by the borrower
  3. Push notifications sent to a smartphone application provided by the lender/servicer and installed by the borrower
  4. Interactive voice messages delivered to the borrower at a phone number they have provided

After hitting send, I got the following automatic response from the CFPB:

"Thank you for emailing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau about your question regarding the Bureau’s regulations.  Please note that we do not provide written responses to questions and that generally we are not able to respond to questions the same business day.  Actual response times will vary depending on the number of questions we are handling and the amount of research needed to answer the question."

A bit disappointing - it seems you have to submit your question in writing, but they are not going to return the favor. And there is no clock ticking on the response time.

So imagine my surprise when less than 4 hours later, I get a call from an attorney at the CFPB.

First the bad news - she tells me I can't rely on what she says as legal advice, then reiterates the prohibition on providing a written response, quipping "what I say is not worth the paper it's written on" (I didn't laugh).

The good news is she said that all four of the methods I asked about would qualify as electronic communications, and if they encouraged the borrower to make live contact with the servicer, would demonstrate the good faith effort required by the rule.

Exactly what I wanted to hear, which brings me to:

Lesson 2: Keep a tape recorder handy. Based on this experience, I'd give the CFPB regulatory hotline a B+ for effort and solid B for results, marking them down only for the ethereal nature of their response. I'd encourage anyone with questions about their rules to try it out. You might even want to ask them the same thing I did to see if they are consistent in their response. If they are, this would be the first time I can honestly say I had a pleasant and productive encounter with a regulator.

Improve the Customer Experience for Bad Customers? Absolutely.

Learn How To Avoid Giving Late-Paying Customers The Red Card

We know that all companies, especially large established corporations, are clamoring for a larger share of the same customer population.  Take wireless carriers:  91% of Americans have a cell phone and over half of them have a smartphone. Think that market is growing from an overall customer base standpoint? If so, it’s not by much.

We also know that all customers are not good customers, meaning they don’t pay their bill on time. There are also those customers who post their grievances online about your company or service wanting ‘more for less’ when you’ve done all you can about explaining and educating about the limits of service or product they’ve purchased.  More on that later but for now, let’s think about all those late payers.  Should we cut them off and say bye-bye?  Since they are late, some really late, it costs your organization more money to deal with these customers due to the collection efforts, right?

Not necessarily. The problem goes back to the limited supply of customers. Even bad ones add significant revenue and profit to a company provided they are managed effectively and given a great customer experience. YES – a great customer experience – even for the bad customers. Late-paying customers already have many reasons why they have not paid their bill. If we cut them off or become overly aggressive, it’s most likely going to be remembered as a bad customer experience.  Why give them another reason not to pay?

The magic in getting better returns from your late-paying customer is a blended strategy of live agents and cross-channel automated communications. Think of it this way: Inform, Remind, Engage, Repeat.

Blending these two strategies gives organizations extremely cost-effective customer communication across multiple channels (voice, email, SMS, Mobile Apps) plus adds the psychological element of having one human being talk to another human being about sensitive items. Take this one step further by being able to decipher customer preferences in channel, time of day, home or mobile as best contact probability,  language, etc., and you’ve got incredible tools available for when the most expensive interaction needs to take place…the Agent-to-Customer interaction.

So don’t just write-off your troublesome customers – use an orchestrated channel strategy to engage them and you’ll reap the benefits in the long term.

Is the tide finally turning on FDCPA and TCPA reform?

tide_turning

About this time last year, the accounts receivable industry was excited about the prospects for modernizing the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) and Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

ACA International, the association of credit and collections professionals, was pushing hard  for legislation that would remove a Catch-22 in the FDCPA that makes it almost impossible for a collection agency to leave a voicemail message for a consumer. And two courageous congressmen, one a Democrat and the other a Republican, had actually introduced a bill to update the TCPA so businesses could provide informational messages (including past due account notifications) to their customer's mobile phones without risking large fines or lawsuits.

The ACA held a lobbying day in Washington DC, sending its members in to ask their representatives for support of these reform efforts. I was one of them, and got sympathetic but non-committal hearings  from the offices of two senators and a congressman from my home state of Washington.

Then politics took over. No sponsors could be found for FDCPA reform and the congressmen were forced to withdraw their TCPA bill when faced with a hysterical onslaught of negative publicity that claimed they wanted to subject consumers to endless sales calls, even though their bill specifically continued the prohibition on calls and messages for marketing purposes.

Fast forward a year, and things are apparently much the same. But appearances can be deceiving.

Last week I once again participated in the ACA's congressional "fly in". This time there is a FDCPA reform bill in committee (Barney Frank's HR 5794) and momentum is building for a narrower TCPA bill that is expected to pay for itself by lowering the cost and increasing the rate of federal tax and student loan collections.

While I didn't get commitments of a "yes" vote from my representatives, I came away with the sense that they don't like laws that make it impossible for businesses to comply and still function. Maybe its a growing realization that businesses create jobs out of the money they are paid for the services and products they provide. That means we need sensible regulation of the process of collecting those payments that must recognize most consumers use answering machines and cell phones as their primary if not only means of communication. And that businesses need the right to communicate with those consumers who chose to do business with them - especially if they are not paying their bills!

If you think changing these laws is important, please let your representatives know. There are two easy ways to do this:

1) Visit their web page at http://house.gov/ and http://www.senate.gov/ and ask them to support HR 5794. Also ask them to consider sponsoring a TCPA reform bill that would remove the distinction between landline and mobile phones for informational communications, while leaving in place the existing restrictions on telemarketing.

2) Go to https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr5794 where you can voice your support to your rep and then sign up for alerts tracking the bill's progress.

The tide may still be out on these two very important issues. But if we all get in the water and make waves...

 

The New Normal for Mortgage Delinquency

Wishes and Horses

The Mortgage Bankers Association says that after slowly declining over the past year, national mortgage delinquency rates ticked up in the second quarter. Mortgage servicers may have begged for better news, but you know what they say about wishes and horses...

In discussing the report, Jay Brinkmann, MBA’s Chief Economist said:

“Mortgage delinquencies were up only slightly over the last quarter. Perhaps more important than the small size of the increase, however, is the fact that it reversed the trend of fairly steady drops in delinquencies we have seen over the last year. This is consistent with the slowdown in the economy during the first half of the year and our stubbornly high unemployment rate. Whether this is just a temporary blip or a sign of a true change in direction for mortgage performance will fundamentally depend on the direction of employment over the remainder of the year.”

MBANDSQ220121 1024x694 The New Normal for Mortgage Delinquency

So if this historically high level of past due accounts is the "new normal", how should mortgage servicers equip themselves to not only survive but thrive until the economy improves?

Here are three suggestions:

  1. Leverage cloud-based systems - Cloud-based systems, especially those delivering software as a service (SaaS), require little upfront investment to obtain the latest innovations in servicing automation. These pay-as-you-go solutions can offer dramatic improvements in operational efficiency while at the same time improving borrower satisfaction...something we've had precious little of in the past 5 years.
  2. Communicate early & often - Getting a jump on struggling borrowers is also key. The earlier a problem with repayment can be identified, the more likely you are to reach a solution that works for both the borrower and the investor. And don't forget that the Treasury pays a premium for modifications begun within the first 120 days of delinquency.
  3. Don't leave borrowers hanging - Once you've engaged a distressed borrower in a discussion of alternatives to foreclosure, the need for timely information about the process goes way up, and so do your inbound calls. This can lead long hold queues in your contact center and borrower frustration. But not every one of these calls needs to go directly to the borrower's single point of contact (SPOC). Make sure you've got the information they are seeking about status, missing documentation and next steps available to the borrower through easy to use self-service applications on your interactive voice response (IVR) system.

I'm sure we'd all like to see a lot less color and much more white on the MBA's quarterly delinquency chart, but until that happens the winners in the servicing game will be those who can most effectively deal with high volumes of delinquent borrowers. Make sure you are one of them.